Up Skill Lab

Don Young Don Young

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

目標を達成するCFE-Law合格問題:有難い問題Certified Fraud Examiner CFE-Law資格認定

P.S.MogiExamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2025 ACFE CFE-Lawダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YsbUu7OwMwTjgtMji0IR6hZgkEfLF1Zr

弊社MogiExamのCFE-Law試験問題を使用するすべての人がCFE-Law試験に合格し、関連する認定資格を取得できることを心から願っています。そして、CFE-Law試験問題の合格率は98％以上です。当社のすべての専門家および教授の唯一の目標は、すべての人々に最適で適切なCFE-Law学習教材を設計することです。多くの顧客のさまざまな要求に応じて、彼らはすべての顧客向けに3種類のCFE-Law認定試験ガイド資料を設計しました：PDF、ソフト、およびAPPバージョン。

CFE-Law認証は、法律業界において高く評価され、世界中の雇用主に認められています。この認証は、法律専門家が詐欺を調査し、予防するために必要な知識とスキルを持っていることを雇用主やクライアントに示し、求職者にとっては競争力のある優位性を提供します。

CFE-Law Examは、不正防止と検出に特化した法律専門家を対象としています。試験は、不正スキームや詐欺、倫理規定やプロフェッショナルの責任、不正行為の法的要素、そして金融取引や不正スキームなど、幅広いトピックをカバーしています。CFE-Law Examは、不正防止と検出に関する深い理解が必要な厳しい試験です。

>> CFE-Law合格問題 <<

素敵なCFE-Law合格問題 & 資格試験のリーダー & ユニークCFE-Law資格認定

CFE-Law学習教材は、業界の経験豊富な専門家によって作成されているため、品質と効率を保証できます。 CFE-Law学習ガイドの内容は、常に命題法に準拠しています。最良のリファレンスとは言えませんが、あなたを失望させないでしょう。私たちは、試験に合格し、認定資格を取得することに熱心な受験者に最適です。 CFE-Lawの実際の試験は、証明書を取得するという夢を実現するのに役立ちます。

CFE-Law Examを受験するためには、候補者は自分の所属する管轄区域で有効な弁護士資格を持っている必要があります。候補者はまた、最低2年間の法律実務経験が必要です。試験はコンピュータベースで、125問の多肢選択問題から構成されています。候補者は4時間以内に試験を受ける必要があります。

ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner 認定 CFE-Law 試験問題 (Q124-Q129):

質問 # 124
Which of the following statements concerning digital currencies, such as bitcoin, is MOST ACCURATE?

A. Digital currencies are attractive to money launderers because they are a payment method that provides complete anonymity
B. Digital currencies are subject to all of the same regulations as payments made through traditional financial institutions
C. Digital currencies are attractive to money launderers because payments often cross jurisdictional boundaries, making it difficult for authorities to pursue enforcement
D. Digital currencies are not typically used to launder money due to strict customer identification or recordkeeping requirements enforced in all jurisdictions

正解：C

質問 # 125
Which of the following situations would constitute a violation of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

A. A private U S company transfers $45,000 to a foreign official to influence the award of a public construction contract.
B. A private U.S company pays a S2.000 foreign corporation fee that is required in order to do business within the country
C. A private UK company transfers $25,000 to a Chilean public official to influence the award of lucrative overseas contracts.
D. A private U.S company transfers $100,000 to the sole proprietor of a Brazilian company to influence the award of a commercial imports contract.

正解：A

質問 # 126
Which of the following statements concerning the appointment of expert witnesses at that is accurate?

A. Generally, the court appoints the primary expert witnesses in inquisitorial jurisdictions.
B. Generally, only the parties may select experts to introduce testimony in adversarial jurisdictions
C. Generally the court selects the primary expert witnesses in adversarial jurisdictions
D. Generally, only the parties may select expert witnesses in inquisitor jurisdictions

正解：A

解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to adversarial, inquisitorial, the question asks about the appointment of expert witnesses at that is accurate.
The correct answer is A: Generally, the court appoints the primary expert witnesses in inquisitorial jurisdictions..
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions. Expert witnesses provide specialized knowledge to help the fact finder understand complex issues. Their testimony must be relevant, reliable, and based on sufficient facts or data. In inquisitorial jurisdictions, the court typically appoints expert witnesses who are considered neutral and objective, while in adversarial systems, the parties generally select their own expert witnesses to support their respective positions.

質問 # 127
Which of the following is an example of a trade-based money laundering scheme?

A. An importer and an exporter conspire to conceal illicit funds by creating invoices that understate the quantity of goods shipped internationally
B. A drug cartel outside of the United States launders illicit funds by hiring runners to deposit small amounts of money in bank accounts throughout the United States
C. An accountant overstates a restaurants revenues to hide illegal funds that are secretly laundered through the business
D. A businessperson deposits illicit funds into the bank account of a company they secretly own which then lends the funds back to them

正解：A

解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 5.
In the context of Money Laundering, specifically relating to money laundering, the question asks about the core concepts in this area.
The correct answer is A: An importer and an exporter conspire to conceal illicit funds by creating invoices that understate the quantity of goods shipped internationally.
This question addresses money laundering concepts. The correct answer correctly identifies the stage, method, or regulatory framework related to money laundering or anti-money laundering efforts. Understanding these processes is critical for fraud examiners working to detect and prevent financial crimes. Money laundering typically involves three stages: placement (introducing illegal funds into the financial system), layering (creating complex transactions to hide the source), and integration (returning the funds to the launderer in an apparently legitimate form).

質問 # 128
Grant, a fraud examiner is investigating Beatrice for embezzlement on his employer's behalf. During his investigation. Grant learns that Beatrice has cheated on her spouse and he tells several of Beatrice's coworkers about it Beatrice discovers that Grant revealed the unflattering (albeit true) information about her and decides to file a claim of defamation against Grant. Which of the following is the BEST explanation of why Beatrice will not win her defamation case?

A. The statement was not printed and distributed
B. The information was true
C. The communications to the subject's coworkers were privileged
D. The news was not communicated to enough people

正解：B

解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 10.
In the context of Basic Principles of Evidence, specifically relating to privilege, the question asks about it Beatrice discovers that Grant revealed the unflattering (albeit true) information about her and decides to file a claim of defamation against Grant, BEST.
The correct answer is A: The information was true.
This question tests knowledge of evidence principles. The correct answer correctly distinguishes between types of evidence, admissibility requirements, or evidentiary privileges. Proper handling of evidence is crucial for successful fraud investigations and prosecutions.

質問 # 129
......

CFE-Law資格認定: https://www.mogiexam.com/CFE-Law-exam.html

P.S.MogiExamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2025 ACFE CFE-Lawダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YsbUu7OwMwTjgtMji0IR6hZgkEfLF1Zr